Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

State of the Union takeaway: Plenty to debate, but the debt ceiling is nonnegotiable | Opinion

President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2023, in Washington, as Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of Calif., applaud. (Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)
President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol, Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2023, in Washington, as Vice President Kamala Harris and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of Calif., applaud. (Jacquelyn Martin, Pool) AP

President Joe Biden’s 2023 State of the Union address was a mixed bag for Republicans in Congress.

On the one hand, he wasn’t shy about challenging them (nor were they reluctant to push back at him). On the other, he touted bipartisan legislation like the infrastructure package and legislation to help veterans exposed to burn pits get care.

One consistent theme we hope Idaho’s congressional delegation heard in Biden’s address was an invitation to the incoming Republican House majority to participate in bipartisan government — something that once worked very well for America.

There’s room for significant policy disagreement within bipartisan government.

Biden floated several ideas that have no shot with a Republican majority in the House: quadrupling the tax on corporate stock buybacks, increasing taxes on the wealthy, banning assault weapons, and so on.

There’s room for Republican posturing, too — passing bills you know don’t have a shot to get past the Senate or a veto.

As long as the actual work of governing gets done.

That will be tested immediately. One of the most important pieces of that work is already past due: raising the debt ceiling.

Biden was clear he would not negotiate about it. And he’s right to take that position.

The debt ceiling is a problem that begins and ends with Congress. Congress passes spending bills. Congress levies taxes. The deficit is the difference between spending and tax revenue, so Congress fully controls the debt.

It is sheer lunacy that the debt ceiling exists at all. How would you speak to business owners who create a rule that says they will stop paying their bills if their debt goes over $100,000?

“The fact that you made decisions that put you in debt doesn’t relieve you of your obligation to pay your bills.”

Now imagine that the business owners get close to breaching that self-imposed limit, and they try to use it as a bargaining chip to extract concessions. You could only laugh at someone that ridiculous, and wonder how they wound up owning a business.

That’s what House Republicans who want to play hardball with the debt ceiling hope to do.

If the Republicans fall in line behind that strategy, it’s hard to overstate the danger.

And as with business owners who decide not to pay their bills for a month, defaulting on the debt would be catastrophic. U.S. Treasuries are the world’s safe asset, the benchmark against which every other asset is measured. Defaulting on the debt means failing to pay them, along with active duty military members and Social Security checks.

The last standoff over the debt ceiling during the Obama administration led the nation’s credit rating to be downgraded — not because any payments were missed, but because there was a sufficient loss of confidence in the competence of Congress in financial markets.

So give up on the debt ceiling as a bargaining chip. Don’t get anywhere near it.

Raise the debt ceiling immediately, and then negotiate about policy. There’s lots of room to do so.

Statesman editorials are the unsigned opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. Board members are opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, editor Chadd Cripe and newsroom editors Dana Oland and Jim Keyser.

This story was originally published February 8, 2023 at 9:12 AM.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What is an editorial?

Statesman editorials are the consensus opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. The editorial board is composed of journalists from the Idaho Statesman and community members. Members of the editorial board are Statesman editor Chadd Cripe, opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, newsroom editors Jim Keyser and Dana Oland and community members John Hess, Debbie McCormick and Julie Yamamoto.

How does the editorial board operate?

The editorial board meets weekly and sometimes invites subjects to board meetings to interview them personally to gain a better understanding of the topic. Board members also communicate throughout the week via email to discuss issues and provide input on editorials on topics as they are happening in real time. Editorials are intended to be part of an ongoing civil discussion with the ultimate goal of providing solutions to community problems.

Why are editorials unsigned?

Editorials reflect the collective views of the Statesman’s editorial board — not just the opinion of one writer. An editorial is a collective opinion based on a group discussion among board members. While the editorial is written by one person, typically the opinion editor, it represents the opinions and viewpoints expressed by members of the editorial board after discussion and research on the topic.

Want your say?

Readers are encouraged to express their thoughts by submitting a letter to the editor. Click on “Submit a letter or opinion” at idahostatesman.com/opinion.

Want more opinions each week?

Subscribe to The Idaho Way weekly email newsletter, a collection of editorials, columns, guest opinions and letters to the editor from the Opinion section of the Idaho Statesman each week. You can sign up for The Idaho Way here.

Related Stories from Idaho Statesman
Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER