Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Little’s masterful maneuver: Idaho education bill they all hated — and still voted for

All day long, Idaho’s most conservative lawmakers said what a terrible, unfair bill was the subject of the special session.

Republicans didn’t like the bill because they were forced to spend money on public education. Democrats didn’t like the bill because some of the tax cuts disproportionately benefit the wealthy and chokes off future tax revenue.

Others thought it violated the Idaho Constitution because it wasn’t a single-subject bill. Many thought this didn’t rise to the occasion of a special session. Still others objected that there was still no property tax relief and no grocery tax relief. Others complained it subverted the Reclaim Idaho Quality Education Act citizens initiative on the November ballot.

Nobody, it seemed, like the bill.

And yet.

The bill passed 55-15 with bipartisan support in the House and 34-1 in the Seante.

The 2022 special session was a masterful political maneuver by Gov. Brad Little. Little put lawmakers in a corner: Oppose a tax cut just before the election, or accept one along with a major education spending increase.

And, while far from perfect, the bill passed in the session is a major step forward for Idaho.

The bill passed by the Legislature will give out $500 million in one-time income tax rebates, cut and flatten the income tax rate, and puts aside $410 million for education — which Idaho sorely needs.

It’s by no means a perfect bill.

A flat tax is not as good as a progressive income tax, where the rich pay significantly more than those with lower incomes. But Idaho has had a progressive income tax in name only for decades now — the switch to an official flat tax is more of a shift in name than in policy.

There was certainly room to reduce tax rates, and Little succeeded in that.

Importantly, this year’s tax rebate will be much more progressive than last year’s, returning a greater portion of one-time money to lower-income taxpayers — although too much of the benefit will again go to those who do not need it.

And, most importantly, the influx of education spending may finally kick Idaho out of its last-in-the-nation standing for per-pupil spending. (Credit for this goes above all to Reclaim Idaho, the grass-roots group that got the Quality Education Act on the ballot, producing enough political pressure to break through the logjam that has long failed Idaho’s children.)

The session also exposed some of Little’s most strident opponents. The Idaho Freedom Foundation, which charged that Little had given into the far left, showed itself for the paper tiger it is. Despite howling in opposition all day, it brought about 15% of votes to its side.

It’s no exaggeration to say that this maneuver was the finest hour of Little’s governorship, at least since the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic.

That said, Little’s test is far from over.

While the special session set aside hundreds of millions for education, it has not yet been appropriated. Next session, the Senate will be packed with many more members of the far-right than Idaho has seen in recent years.

If Little wins reelection in November, he will have to be prepared for the pushback that those new members will bring to bear — quite likely by trying to block appropriation of that new education funding. He’s going to have to be prepared to twist arms again to get this over the finish line.

Statesman editorials are the unsigned opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. Board members are opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, editor Chadd Cripe, newsroom editors Dana Oland and Jim Keyser and community members Johanna Jones and Maryanne Jordan.

This story was originally published September 2, 2022 at 4:00 AM.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What is an editorial?

Statesman editorials are the consensus opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. The editorial board is composed of journalists from the Idaho Statesman and community members. Members of the editorial board are Statesman editor Chadd Cripe, opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, newsroom editors Jim Keyser and Dana Oland and community members John Hess, Debbie McCormick and Julie Yamamoto.

How does the editorial board operate?

The editorial board meets weekly and sometimes invites subjects to board meetings to interview them personally to gain a better understanding of the topic. Board members also communicate throughout the week via email to discuss issues and provide input on editorials on topics as they are happening in real time. Editorials are intended to be part of an ongoing civil discussion with the ultimate goal of providing solutions to community problems.

Why are editorials unsigned?

Editorials reflect the collective views of the Statesman’s editorial board — not just the opinion of one writer. An editorial is a collective opinion based on a group discussion among board members. While the editorial is written by one person, typically the opinion editor, it represents the opinions and viewpoints expressed by members of the editorial board after discussion and research on the topic.

Want your say?

Readers are encouraged to express their thoughts by submitting a letter to the editor. Click on “Submit a letter or opinion” at idahostatesman.com/opinion.

Want more opinions each week?

Subscribe to The Idaho Way weekly email newsletter, a collection of editorials, columns, guest opinions and letters to the editor from the Opinion section of the Idaho Statesman each week. You can sign up for The Idaho Way here.

Related Stories from Idaho Statesman
Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER