Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Editorials

Use insulin? Idaho’s senators just hung you out to dry. Thank them for your next bill

Idaho’s Senate delegation shows no sign of cleaning up its act. It continues to put the interests of wealthy donors and the national Republican party ahead of the citizens of the state of Idaho. And on Sunday night, they did so in an especially egregious fashion.

Last week, we noted that Sen. Mike Crapo — who recently received a massive infusion of campaign cash from the pharmaceutical industry — was working to raise objections to allowing the federal government to negotiate the prices Medicare pays for prescription drugs.

This week, he succeeded. Crapo — along with Sen. Jim Risch — voted against including a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act that would cap the monthly out-of-pocket costs for people who use insulin at $35. Seven Republicans, either more concerned about their constituents’ welfare or more concerned they might lose a general election race, crossed party lines to support the effort.

But not Crapo and Risch. They acted, along with only 41 other Republicans, to ensure people with diabetes will pay more.

Insulin, a cash cow for some of the pharmaceutical companies Crapo and Risch are protecting, has grown so expensive that a Yale study found about one in seven daily insulin users spend 40% of their income after food and housing on the drug.

And the price has utterly skyrocketed, for a very old drug that isn’t the subject of a great deal of recent innovation.

Why? It isn’t manufacturing costs or higher demand or anything like that. There are only a few companies that control nearly all of the insulin market, and they can simply pay their shareholders more if they set prices that send a significant portion of the patients who need them into poverty. And corporations answer to shareholders.

These high prices don’t just hit people’s pocketbooks. They have enormous health consequences. As the Idaho Capital Sun reported, one in four diabetics say that they have rationed their insulin — which can cause sustained high blood sugar levels and result in organ damage or even death.

No other developed country is foolish enough to allow a situation like this to persist. As a RAND study indicates, Americans pay about 10 times as much for insulin as citizens of peer countries.

That’s why government intervention is needed. Cap the price, and the drug will still be profitable, just not outlandishly so. And diabetics will get the insulin they need.

Crapo was on the record supporting a similar cap just a few months ago, though one that would only aid those who have purchased enhanced Medicaid Part D plans. But on Sunday night, he voted to kill a better version of the same proposal.

Maybe Crapo and Risch simply didn’t want to give the Democrats a victory to tout in the midterms. And the continued suffering of people with diabetes — that’s just the cost of doing business.

But it’s utterly unacceptable behavior from people who were elected to represent their constituents — not their party or big pharma or whoever their latest campaign donor is. And about 137,000 of those constituents have diabetes, according to the Department of Health and Welfare.

Those people deserve better than the treatment they’re getting from Crapo and Risch.

Statesman editorials are the unsigned opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. Board members are opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, editor Chadd Cripe, newsroom editors Dana Oland and Jim Keyser and community members Johanna Jones, Maryanne Jordan and Ben Ysursa.

This story was originally published August 9, 2022 at 4:00 AM.

BEHIND THE STORY

MORE

What is an editorial?

Statesman editorials are the consensus opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. The editorial board is composed of journalists from the Idaho Statesman and community members. Members of the editorial board are Statesman editor Chadd Cripe, opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, assistant editor Jim Keyser and community members John Hess, Debbie McCormick and Julie Yamamoto. 

How does the editorial board operate?

The editorial board meets weekly and sometimes invites subjects to board meetings to interview them personally to gain a better understanding of the topic. Board members also communicate throughout the week via email to discuss issues and provide input on editorials on topics as they are happening in real time. Editorials are intended to be part of an ongoing civil discussion with the ultimate goal of providing solutions to community problems. 

Why are editorials unsigned?

Editorials reflect the collective views of the Statesman’s editorial board — not just the opinion of one writer. An editorial is a collective opinion based on a group discussion among board members. While the editorial is written by one person, typically the opinion editor, it represents the opinions and viewpoints expressed by members of the editorial board after discussion and research on the topic.

Want your say?

Readers are encouraged to express their thoughts by submitting a letter to the editor. Click on “Submit a letter or opinion” at idahostatesman.com/opinion.

Want more opinions each week?

Subscribe to The Idaho Way weekly email newsletter, a collection of editorials, columns, guest opinions and letters to the editor from the Opinion section of the Idaho Statesman each week. You can sign up for The Idaho Way here.

Get unlimited digital access
#ReadLocal

Try 1 month for $1

CLAIM OFFER