A MAJOR theme of the Republican convention was that a vote for Donald Trump is a vote to restore America’s position in world affairs, which President Obama has, in the GOP view, deliberately undermined. Trump “will rebuild our military and stand with our allies,” vice presidential nominee Mike Pence proclaimed. He also said: “We cannot have four more years of apologizing to our enemies and abandoning our friends.”
In reality, Trump’s political rise has already disturbed traditional American allies and encouraged adversaries such as Russia, because of the candidate’s own disparagement of U.S. security alliances with Europe, Japan and South Korea. And in the midst of the Cleveland get-together — nearly overlapping with his running mate’s remarks, in fact — Trump was giving an interview to the New York Times that was giving the lie to his supporters and reinforcing doubts about his potential policies abroad.
Stand with our allies? No, Trump told the Times, we “always have to be prepared to walk,” lest they rip us off for the costs of defending them. In his transactional world, there is no such thing as a long-term U.S. investment that pays for itself many times over in global stability. Chillingly, Trump even seemed to place conditions on NATO’s ironclad mutual security guarantee, saying he would honor it in the event of a Russian attack on the Baltic states if the victim of that attack had, in his opinion, “fulfilled their obligations to us.”
This is an extraordinary willingness to question 70 years of bedrock political consensus on U.S. foreign policy — one that includes Obama, who has dispatched U.S. troops to defend the Baltics. Of course, there is no such thing as an unquestionable policy. What’s astonishing about Trump, though, is the obvious casualness with which he muses about such matters — as if the words of even a potential commander in chief do not influence world affairs the moment they are uttered.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Idaho Statesman
#ReadLocal
Where Ronald Reagan saw his country as a shining city on a hill, Trump, apparently, perceives the moral equivalent of a low-rent district.
Contrary to his apologists in Cleveland, Trump does not understand the value of American global leadership, or the moral ground upon which it ultimately rests. If he becomes president, the retreat of U.S. influence for which Republicans now hold Mr. Obama culpable will likely turn into a rout.
Comments