Higher ed budget passes Idaho Senate but unease remains. ‘They’re going to get the message.’

This story was first published March 17, 2021, at IdahoEdNews.org.

After spirited debate about campus social justice programs — and whether a $409,000 funding shift sent enough of a message — senators approved a higher education budget Wednesday.

All told, the budget would carve up $631.4 million for the four four-year institutions, including $315.2 million of state tax dollars. But much of the debate centered on a $409,000 shift from Boise State University to Lewis-Clark State College, to take away dollars Boise State had spent on social justice programs.

The budget bill’s floor sponsor, Sen. Carl Crabtree, R-Grangeville, described the budget as a common-sense first step to rein in the four-year institutions.

“Frankly I don’t think our voice has been heard adequately by our colleges and universities,” he said.

Crabtree said the $409,000 shift was not arbitrary, but instead reflected what Boise State said it had spent on social justice programs. And he noted that the budget will require the four schools to report all social justice spending to the Legislature in January. “They’re going to get the message,” he said.

Some Senate conservatives were unconvinced.

Sen. Christy Zito, R-Hammett, urged senators to strip down the higher education budget and support a mission of producing “job-ready people.” Sen. Steve Vick, R-Dalton Gardens, said the budget fell short because it failed to address systemwide social justice issues. “It only sends a message to Boise State University,” he said.

Three Boise Democrats said they were voting for the budget, despite the $409,000 cut to Boise State. “I think we’re in dangerous territory,” Sen. Melissa Wintrow said. “I think that borders on censorship.”

The bill passed 27-6, with dissenting votes coming from Republicans Regina Bayer, Meridian; Kevin Cook, Idaho Falls; Lori Den Hartog, Meridian; Doug Ricks, Rexburg; Vick; and Zito. The measure now goes to a more conservative House — which voted down two higher education budget bills in 2020, before finally agreeing on a spending plan.

Senators preserve August school election date

School districts will still be able to run bond and levy elections in August, after a vote in the Senate State Affairs Committee on Wednesday.

The committee killed a bill that would have eliminated the August election date — one of four days when school districts can bring ballot measures before voters.

The voice vote came after Senate President Pro Tem Chuck Winder said the election debate was a symptom of a much larger issue: a state K-12 budget that leaves more than 90 school districts reliant on voter-approved supplemental levies.

“I wouldn’t say it’s criminal that we have to have supplemental levies, but it’s pretty close to that,” said Winder, R-Boise.

In many ways, Wednesday’s committee hearing was a reprise of a hearing in the House State Affairs Committee in February.

West Ada School District chief financial officer Jonathan Gillen and Middleton School Board Chairman Kirk Adams told senators that their districts’ August levies helped head off staff cuts for 2020-21. The Idaho School Boards Association and the Idaho Association of School Administrators both spoke against the bill, reminding committee members that the districts had agreed several years ago to a consolidated election calendar.

“(This) feels completely unfair to us,” said Quinn Perry, policy & government affairs director of the ISBA.

Deputy secretary of state Jason Hancock again pushed for House Bill 106, saying it would give counties a much-needed summer pause in the elections cycle — time they could use for training or checking voter rolls. While only nine to 12 counties a year conduct August elections, counties such as Canyon and Madison have been running elections every August for several years.

“It’s a pace that they didn’t have to run at 10 years ago,” Hancock said.

While the debate was a rerun, the outcome was different. A month ago, House State Affairs endorsed House Bill 106 on nearly a party-line vote, setting the stage for the bill to pass the House 45-24.