Proposed federal watchdog for consumer finance advances

WASHINGTON -- Consumer advocates cheered and the financial sector jeered Thursday as a controversial plan to create a federal agency to regulate mortgages, credit cards and other forms of consumer credit cleared a key House of Representatives committee on its way to an uncertain future.

The House Financial Services Committee, on a 39-29 mostly party-line vote, passed legislation to create a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, a centerpiece of President Barack Obama's broader proposal to revamp financial regulation in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.

"This step sends an important signal to the American people that we will not stand by and allow big financial firms and their lobbyists to mobilize against change," Obama said in a statement after the committee vote.

"They are doing what they always do: descending on Congress, using every bit of influence they have to maintain the status quo that has maximized their profits at the expense of American consumers, despite the fact that recently those same American consumers bailed them out as a consequence of the bad decisions that they made."

The fact that a breakdown in U.S. mortgage-lending standards and widespread predatory lending triggered the financial crisis is driving the push for the legislation. As the recession deepened, banks pulled back credit and raised credit card fees, amplifying a deep contraction in credit to consumers, who drive about 70 percent of U.S. economic activity.

These factors -- along with acknowledgment from bank regulators and the Federal Reserve that they'd dropped the ball on consumer protection -- convinced the administration that a new approach and a separate federal entity are necessary.

Harvard University law professor Elizabeth Warren long advocated for such an agency, and after the House panel's vote she said it was a day she thought would never come.

"When I first came to Washington with the idea of this agency, everyone told me the banks always win -- quit now because the banks always win," she said. "They didn't win today."

Warren now heads a special congressional panel that's overseeing how bank bailout money is being spent.

Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., said he expected the measure to pass the full House by Thanksgiving. In a news conference, he reminded that his legislation isn't just about reining in abuses in mortgage lending or crippling credit card fees, but also forms of lending such as payday loans, check cashing operations and remittance services that have little or no government oversight.

"The sad fact is, the lower your income is in America, the more you are paying for financial transactions," Frank said.

Democratic Reps. Walt Minnick of Idaho and Travis Childers of Mississippi voted against the bill. Republican Michael Castle of Delaware voted for it. Castle is running for the Senate against Vice President Joe Biden's son Beau.

Although Frank's measure is expected to pass the full House easily, he hopes to amend his own legislation because a bipartisan amendment that passed his committee would exempt auto dealers from oversight by the panel. Many auto dealers make more money from car loans than they do from car sales.

"They've allowed auto dealers to sell a variety of different loans. In theory, an auto dealer can sell a payday loan and not be covered by this agency," Travis Plunkett, the director of regulatory and legislative affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, said in an interview. "If we've learned anything from this (financial) crisis, it's that you have to regulate according to what happens, not what you call yourself."

The consumer panel faces an uphill climb in the Senate, as banks and credit card companies are trying to convince senators that the power to regulate consumer credit products should remain with bank regulators.

"The battle now shifts to the Senate," said Scott Talbott, the senior vice president for government affairs at the Financial Services Roundtable, the lobby for big financial institutions. "It is a huge expansion of government power, and the cost of the agency -- as well as the negative effects on the credit markets -- probably outweighs the perceived benefits."


To ask a question about this story or any economic question, go to McClatchy's economy Q&A

How Moody's sold its ratings - and sold out investors

Bill to tighten rules on ratings agencies has big loopholes

Workplaces face wage stagnation

Follow the latest politics news at McClatchy's Planet Washington

Related stories from Idaho Statesman