Dietrich School District administrators and football coaches have denied a lawsuit’s claim that they knew about the racial harassment and physical abuse of a mentally disabled black student.
The defendants also said the district’s superintendent handled rape allegations properly from the moment he heard reports of an attack against the student.
The civil lawsuit, filed last month in U.S. District Court, claims school administrators and football coaches “were aware of or should have been aware of numerous incidents in which the plaintiff was subject to severe and pervasive harassment, racial discrimination, mental and physical assault and battery culminating in a vicious anal rape of the plaintiff by several white male students.”
In their answer, filed Thursday, lawyers for the school district said the plaintiff first complained of abuse Oct. 23, the day after the reported sexual assault.
Never miss a local story.
“The district had policies enabling and encouraging students and their parents to report instances of bullying, harassment, abuse, hazing, etc., thereby creating an effective mechanism to stop such misconduct,” the defendants’ answer said. “Until Oct. 23, 2015, neither plaintiff nor his family submitted any such complaint to any member of the district; and thereby failed to provide notice to the district that the alleged misconduct had occurred or was occurring, thereby depriving defendants of an opportunity to stop or prevent such misconduct.”
Shelley McDaniel, the plaintiff’s mother, said Friday that she did report to football coaches and the district superintendent that her son was being bullied. But she said much of the abuse was even hidden from her because of the “bro code” on the football team — players weren’t supposed to speak about what happened between them.
Superintendent Ben Hardcastle took “immediate and necessary steps” to investigate the claims, report the incident to law enforcement, and recommend the expulsion of two students and the suspension of a third as soon as he learned of the alleged sexual assault, according to the defendants’ response.
Those students now face criminal charges. The two students who were expelled are John R.K. Howard, 18, of Keller, Texas, and Tanner Ray Ward, 17, of Richfield, who are both charged as adults with felony forcible penetration with a foreign object. The student who was suspended is charged as a juvenile and all records pertaining to his case are sealed.
Defendants in the civil suit include the school district, Hardcastle, Principal Stephanie Shaw, district board members Starr Olson, Brad Dotson, Benjamin Hoskisson, Kris Hubert and Perry Van Tassell, and football coaches Mike Torgensen, Bret Peterson, Rick Astle and Wayne Dill.
The defendants are represented by Boise law firm Anderson, Julian and Hull.
Hardcastle and an attorney for the defendants did not return a call seeking comment Friday. in the formal answer filed Thursday, the defendants and their lawyers defended their actions and said they believed the victim was “well liked.”
“Defendants reassert that they neither knew nor had reason to know of any alleged harassment or bullying,” the answer said. “To the contrary, to defendants’ knowledge plaintiff was well liked by the rest of his teammates on the high school football team, had many friends on the team and was treated well by them.”
Administrators and football coaches did admit they knew the victim received a “wedgie” that tore his underwear prior to practice the day of the alleged sexual assault. They also admitted knowing about a classroom chalkboard drawing that depicted the black teen sitting in the back of a bus.
They said the student who made the drawing did not understand why it would be considered derogatory.
“Defendants add that the student (who drew the picture) was not a member of the football team,” the lawyers wrote in their answer. “When questioned, the student stated he was not aware of the pejorative nature of the drawing, and when counseled by the superintendent, apologized.”
The defendants said that the student who drew the picture is “a good friend” of the victim, and that before and after the drawing, the victim has stayed the night at the other student’s home.
But Shelley McDaniel said Friday that the student did know the drawing was derogatory because the student’s father is the school’s history teacher.
Aside from those two admissions, the defendants denied all other allegations. Their denials include:
▪ The “humiliating mental abuse and brutal physical violence suffered” by the victim was “clearly apparent, obviously foreseeable and entirely preventable” and that the defendants “ignored or neglected their clear duty with deliberate indifference.”
▪ The plaintiff “suffered through numerous incidents of racially motivated physical and mental abuse, racial harassment and humiliation and outright deprivations of his constitutional right to due process and equal protection of law at the hands of students and employees of the district … (who) knew or should have known and did nothing to prevent or deter.”
▪ The defendants knew the plaintiff was “particularly vulnerable to bullying and harassment and was essentially helpless and incapable of defending himself.” In their answer, the defendants argued “a disability does not necessarily indicate vulnerability or helplessness — and in plaintiff’s case, defendants were not aware of such vulnerability or helplessness.”
▪ The defendants “deliberately or negligently placed the plaintiff in danger by acting with deliberate indifference to a known and obvious danger.”
▪ The plaintiff was taunted and called racist names in the presence of school officials.
▪ John Howard knocked the plaintiff unconscious while encircled by football players and coaches at a preseason camp. The defendants answered that allegation by saying it was Howard who “received a head injury during scrimmage drills” and was taken to the hospital, and that the plaintiff was not injured during the camp.
HISTORY OF BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS?
As for the allegations that the victim was sexually assaulted, the defendants said they learned about the reported attack after it happened.
“Defendants admit only that on Oct. 22, 2015, an incident occurred in the locker room where Tanner Ward and John Howard were involved in activities which may have resulted in a physical altercation involving the plaintiff,” the answer said. “As none of the defendants were present at the time of the alleged activities, the above statement is based upon information obtained by defendants after the alleged incident.”
District administrators denied some allegations with the caveat that they didn’t know enough to answer the allegations, such as whether John Howard transferred to Dietrich because of behavior problems in Texas.
The defendants used that same caveat when they denied the victim was subjected to “aggressive humping” and “simulating anal sex” during football practices.
One of the attorneys for the McDaniel family, Lee Schlender, said Friday that he had not seen the the defendants’ answer and therefore had no response. But Shelley McDaniel called the denials “typical of Mr. Hardcastle” and typical of a town where people “see something and just turn their head and walk away.”
And though her son’s civil lawsuit against the district and administrators seeks $10 million or more in damages, Shelley McDaniel said she’d simply be happy with stoking change in the small town.
“If we can get them to change these policies and the way they handled this whole situation, that would be a win as far as I’m concerned,” McDaniel said Friday. “Because it’s got to stop. Somebody needs to learn a lesson from this.”
No hearings in the civil case have been scheduled. In the criminal case, a preliminary hearing for Howard scheduled for Friday was delayed at the request of the attorney general. It was rescheduled for July 29.