Sage grouse debate has the West's attention

Otter's team in Idaho has worked to create a management plan for the bird the state can live with.


MINERAL COUNTY, Nev. - In the frozen chill of a high desert morning, Tony Wasley, the director of the Nevada Department of Wildlife, peers through a range finder down a dirt path and points out a group of birds strutting and preening among a low scrub brush.

It's mating season for the sage grouse, and dozens of males are descending upon breeding grounds, called leks, to show off their plumage to the hens.

The 40 or so grouse at this lek near the Nevada-California border look ridiculous. They waddle around, occasionally heaving their bodies into flight, sometimes chasing off younger males. They are the avian equivalent of a clubgoer showing off his shiny new coat.

They are also at the center of a long battle that pits environmentalists who want the sage grouse protected against ranchers, energy producers and state governments that stand to lose billions of dollars in tax revenue and economic activity if tens of millions of acres are blocked off from development, exploration or use.

The tension between the federal government and states in the West garnered new attention last month, when the Bureau of Land Management moved to round up cattle owned by Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy over more than $1 million in unpaid grazing fees. Some state officials fear that a decision to list the sage grouse as endangered could create a slew of new Bundys all over the rural West.

"Western states never welcome outsiders coming in and telling them how to do something," said Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, who co-chairs a bipartisan task force working to conserve sage grouse habitats and prevent its inclusion on a list of threatened animals.


The fight over the sage grouse is similar in many respects to the debate over the Northern spotted owl, which in 1990 was listed as threatened. That decision shut down timber operations across more than 24 million acres in California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia, contributing to the industry's precipitous decline.

The difference is that the sage grouse covers about 165 million acres, almost seven times the range of the spotted owl. The economic impact of virtually shutting down development in sage grouse habitats could be orders of magnitude greater than what happened in the Pacific Northwest.

Much of the sagebrush range already is being drilled for oil and natural gas, while thousands of new wells wait for permits. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind farms, dot the sagebrush range. Even a gold mine in eastern Nevada would be affected.

"It's going to affect agriculture, oil and gas, wind, all kinds of different industries," said Kathleen Sgamma, vice president of government and public affairs at the Denver-based Western Energy Alliance. "We're talking about such a wide-ranging impact."

The sage grouse has a long history in the American imagination. It is represented in Native American traditional dance and artwork. Lewis and Clark brought back drawings of a bird they called the spiny-tailed pheasant. Conservationist Rachel Carson warned in her seminal work, "Silent Spring," that sage brush habitat was being converted to grassland for livestock.

Sage grouse populations have "been declining significantly in numbers, and it's very susceptible to development," Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said in a December interview with The Washington Post.

"When you look at the Western landscapes and you look at what's happening, there isn't a state where there's this habitat that's not in some form of trouble."

The federal Fish and Wildlife Service, which ultimately is responsible for deciding whether to include an animal on the endangered species list, has been considering the several subspecies of sage grouse for about 15 years.

In 2005, the agency decided it would not list the grouse as threatened. Environmental groups filed a lawsuit, and a federal judge overturned the finding two years later. In 2010, the agency said the bird warranted protection.

Under an agreement between Fish and Wildlife and the environmental groups, the agency has until the end of September 2015 to propose rules governing the bird's habitat or to change its mind on protection.


Environmentalists say protecting the sage grouse habitat is crucial to saving many more species, such as the pronghorn and the pygmy rabbit, that call the high desert home.

"The sage grouse is an umbrella species, so it's sort of the canary in the coal mine," said Randi Spivak, the public lands program director at the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the groups that initially sued the Interior Department to force it to recognize the sage grouse as threatened.

It's not just industry that wants to keep the sage grouse off the endangered list. States are working desperately to convince the federal government to decline to list the bird.

The 11 affected states set up a bipartisan task force in 2011, co-chaired by Hickenlooper and Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead. It is working with Fish and Wildlife, the Bureau of Land Management and other federal agencies to coordinate conservation strategies and management plans.

"The focus of all this is, how do we demonstrate that we're going to do a better job of creating a proactive strategy?" Hickenlooper said. "We can probably do a better job with our local programs and partnerships than Fish and Wildlife can, trying to regulate from afar."

The stakes involved in Fish and Wildlife's decision are huge. The bird's historic range covers about 160 million acres across the Mountain West region, including huge swaths of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Oregon and Nevada.

"The Fish and Wildlife Service ... must follow the best available science, and it must make sure that whatever's being done is proven to be effective. And so we're trying to keep all governors at the table," Jewell said. "If one state doesn't play, it could impact all of them."


Idaho has been aggressive in working to find a way to protect the bird, work with the feds and remain in control of what happens within its borders.

In Idaho, BLM chose "co-preferred" alternatives for a sage grouse conservation plan to amend 21 resource management plans and eight Forest Service land use plans over 10 million acres of public land in Idaho and Montana. One of the two alternatives was the Idaho sage grouse plan written by a team that Gov. Butch Otter created.

Otter's sage grouse plan was designed to garner wide support so that Idaho can go into federal court supporting the federal government with key environmental groups on board. That approach worked when the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals backed Idaho's alternative roadless plan in 2012.

The Idaho and BLM plans have much in common. Both have triggers that require more limits and conservation measures if sage grouse habitat is destroyed by fire or if the number of birds plummets. Both ban development in the highest-quality habitat.

Idaho places 4.9 million acres in that category, and allows some exceptions; the BLM labels 7 million acres as the most restrictive in a different arrangement. But in negotiations through the winter, the two sides got closer on their management plans.

Some officials worry that a listing decision could actually harm state conservation efforts. Putting the sage grouse on threatened status "will be an incredible disincentive for states to develop voluntary conservation strategies," said Shawn Reese, Mead's policy director in Wyoming.


Estimates of the total economic impact depend on which conservation plans the government chooses. Plans calling for the strictest conservation measures could cost up to 31,000 jobs, up to $5.6 billion in annual economic activity and more than $262 million in lost state and local revenue every year, according to a widely cited study conducted by environmental lawyer Lowell Baier that is accepted by interests on both sides of the debate.

Several members of Congress have urged the Interior Department to hold off on making a final determination. Last July, Sens. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., and Mark Udall, D-Colo., invited Jewell and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to their state to see the progress Colorado had made in protecting the Gunnison sage grouse.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., have released a discussion draft of a bill that would address sage grouse conservation. In February, 10 governors met with Jewell and Fish and Wildlife Service Director Daniel Ashe.

State land and wildlife managers almost uniformly believe that the Fish and Wildlife Service will rule against them and list the sage grouse as threatened.

"They're leaning toward listing it," said John Harja, head of Utah's Public Lands Policy Coordination Office and a member of the multi-state Sage Grouse Task Force. "We have great concerns."

If the greater sage grouse is listed as threatened, the 11 states could be on the hook for as much as $1 billion in conservation costs. Adding to that burden, most states fund land programs through user fees, rather than out of general funds; declaring a species threatened makes it harder to generate those fees.

"If the hunters can't hunt, if the miners can't mine, if you don't have that capital, then you lose," said Leo Drozdoff, director of the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

A billion-dollar tab trying to save the greater sage grouse habitat, he said, "is almost insurmountable."

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service