After Idaho eliminated nonemergency adult dental care in 2011, emergency room costs ballooned from $30,000 a month to $65,000 a month today.
Now, the state is looking to restore the coverage.
Its an important reinstatement of services, said Sen. Dan Schmidt, D-Moscow, a physician who serves on the Legislatures joint budget committee.
He noted that he debated against the cut in the Senate in 2011, saying, You can save money in your car by not changing the oil, but thats not the right way to save money.
Idaho Health and Welfare Director Dick Armstrong said the 2011 cut, which removed some coverage for 42,000 adults, was a failure. In one case, sepsis caused by an abscessed tooth cost the Medicaid program $300,000.
Armstrong said the state was desperate to save money in the program when it made the cuts and didnt want to cut services to children. We had to do something, he said.
Lawmakers had hoped to save $1.7 million by the move.
I dont know what the net was, Armstrong said Tuesday. All we know is that in the long run, it isnt a good place to be. Dental health is too important to physical health.
It can be neglected for short periods of time, he said, but in the long run, there is no return on investment.
For next year, the Department of Health and Welfare budget request includes restoring the service for 27,000 adults who now would be eligible.
Other states that removed dental benefits have seen increases in emergency room services and hospital costs, indicating that the savings found from removing this benefit were short-term in nature and can lead to future utilization costs, according to the departments budget request.
The department requested $1.4 million in state general funds next year to restore the coverage, which would bring in $3.5 million in federal matching funds; the total cost is $4.9 million.
Gov. Butch Otter didnt recommend the funding but did recommend restoring the coverage, drawing on savings from a recent renegotiation of the states Medicaid dental services contract.
Paul Leary, Medicaid administrator for the state, said the roughly $5 million savings from the contract renegotiation should easily cover the cost, mainly because of a decreased utilization of services.
Somehow were going to take care of it one way or the other, and the prudent thing to do would be to take care of it where its less expensive to the taxpayer, said Sen. Shawn Keough, R-Sandpoint, vice chair of the joint budget committee.
She said she expects lawmakers to approve the recommendation. Budget setting for state agencies starts next month.