Expert: ‘Our citizens are not to blame’ for welfare rate

SPOKESMAN-REVIEWJanuary 14, 2014 

Idaho is no welfare state, legislators were assured Monday, even though 20 percent of the population now receives some form of aid.

Idaho’s benefits remain paltry compared to most states, and even after big jumps in the state’s food stamp rolls through the recession, Idaho’s food stamp rate remains below the national average.

“No one can live as a welfare king or queen in Idaho,” Health and Welfare Director Dick Armstrong told legislative budget writers Monday as they opened a week of hearings on health and human services budgets.

The libertarian Cato Institute published a report in August comparing state welfare programs by calculating the dollar value of benefits; Idaho’s ranked last, with its benefits calculated to be worth the equivalent of working for $5.36 per hour. Mississippi ranked next-to-last. The highest state was Hawaii, at $29.13 an hour; Massachusetts was second at $24.30.

Idaho had the highest rate of adults on assistance participating in work programs, at 88 percent. “Other states should learn from Idaho,” report author Michael Tanner wrote.

Idaho has seen big increases in the past decade in some of its public assistance programs. For example, 4.6 percent of Idahoans received food stamps in 2001; in 2013, it was 14.2 percent. But that’s still below the national average of just under 15 percent.

Idaho’s Medicaid enrollment has jumped from 10.3 percent of its population in 2001 to 15.5 percent in 2013. But the last national comparison by the Kaiser Family Foundation, reflecting July 1, 2010, figures, showed Idaho tied with Wyoming for ninth-lowest in Medicaid participation.

And as far as cash assistance, Idaho’s welfare program is among the stingiest in the nation. According to the U.S. Administration for Children and Families and the U.S. Census, as of June 2013 less than one-tenth of 1 percent of Idaho’s population received benefits. The national average was 1.2 percent.

“This measure, along with the low amount of benefits available, shows very plainly that Idaho is not a welfare state,” Armstrong told lawmakers. “If you are an able-bodied adult receiving public assistance, you have to take part in work-search or job-training activities.”

Armstrong said Idaho Department of Labor figures show that the problem is that the state lost large numbers of high-paying jobs during the recession. The gained back since are mostly lower-paying, service-sector jobs. The result: People are working again, but not making as much, so they still qualify for aid like food stamps to make ends meet.

As long as wages remain low, Armstrong said, “We are going to see high utilization of public assistance programs. Our public assistance programs are not to blame for the increased use. They are about as lean as we can make them. And our citizens are not to blame.” Idaho has the nation’s highest rate of people working more than one job, Armstrong said.

The answer, Armstrong said, is better work opportunities: “When we get to that, the high utilization of public assistance will take care of itself.”

“We are a symptom of what’s going on in the economy. We don’t drive it,” Armstrong said.

Rep. Shirley Ringo, D-Moscow, said the figures should worry lawmakers.

Low-paying jobs are forcing more Idahoans onto public assistance.

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service