Court grants law license to man in U.S. illegally

Sergio Garcia has been admitted to the California bar, but under federal law, no law firm or business can legally hire him.


LOS ANGELES — As a teenager in Northern California, Sergio Garcia worked in the almond fields and in a grocery store, earning his way through college and then law school. He passed the California bar exam on his first try, something just half of all candidates do.

But when it came time to apply for his law license, Garcia, a Mexican immigrant, encountered a formidable hurdle: Because he lacked legal status, he could not become a lawyer.

That changed Thursday when the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously that a law passed in fall 2013 by the Legislature allowed Garcia, 36, to practice law. What it did not do is address the fact that he legally can’t be hired in America.


The strange turn of events demonstrates the complicated patchwork of immigration laws that is emerging as Congress remains stalled on an overhaul of the immigration laws and states and courts are stepping in and deciding what rights should be granted to the estimated more than 11 million immigrants living illegally in the country.

Courts in Florida and New York are grappling with similar cases involving immigrants seeking to become lawyers, and Robert Morgenthau, the former district attorney of Manhattan, has urged New York’s governor and Legislature to pass a law like California’s.

Several states have begun to expand opportunities for immigrants living here illegally, after a wave of laws passed several years ago in Alabama, Arizona and Georgia and other states to crack down on illegal immigration.

Unauthorized immigrants can receive in-state college tuition in several states, and 11 states and the District of Columbia allow such immigrants to obtain some kind of driver’s license.


Garcia, in a telephone interview, said he felt that despite the ambiguities, he would be free to open his own practice.

“I can finally fulfill my dream and also leave behind a legacy so that an undocumented student 20 or 30 years from now will take it for granted that they can be an attorney,” he said. “There’s a lot to celebrate. I can open my own law firm, and that’s exactly what I intend to do. There’s no law in this country restricting entrepreneurs.”

In its ruling, the court said that California had paved the way for Garcia’s admission to the bar in October when the Legislature overwhelmingly passed a bill saying that qualified applicants could be admitted to the state bar regardless of their immigration status. The court went on to suggest that immigration status should not be considered any differently from, say, race or religion.

But in its lengthy ruling, the court appeared to leave aside the issue of employment, saying only that “we assume that a licensed undocumented immigrant will make all necessary inquiries and take appropriate steps to comply with applicable legal restrictions and will advise potential clients of any possible adverse or limiting effect the attorney’s immigration status may pose.”

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service