What ails Idahos public education system isnt all that mysterious. Its underfunded. Student performance on standardized tests is average at best. Teacher salaries are not competitive.
It is all fueled in large part by a visible hostility toward teachers on the part of Idahos elected leadership. Morale is depressed. Too few of Idahos high school graduates continue on to college, and too few of them complete their schooling.
The Gem State is among only eight states that do nothing in the way of funding early childhood education. Propelled by the voters rejection of state Superintendent Tom Lunas overhaul package a year ago, Idaho now seems poised toward tackling all of its problems.
Well, almost all of them.
Gov. Butch Otters task force yielded a road map toward ramping up spending, including an ambitious plan to improve teacher pay. Standards are being raised in part to produce high school graduates capable of doing college-level work.
But Idaho has turned a blind eye to prekindergarten programs.
It does this even though other states most recently Mississippi are passing Idaho. Nearly two-thirds of Idahos 3- and 4-year-olds are not enrolled in preschool. Only four states perform worse.
Argue the skeptics: How can Idaho take this on at a time when its trying to boost spending for K-12?
How can it not? The state already spends a fortune on remedial programs in the schools, not to mention the fallout from student failure welfare dependency, teenage pregnancy and crime.
Placing a preschooler on a path toward success in school is the surest, most cost-effective school reform available. A Michigan study concluded that every $1 spent on pre-K returned $16.14, including $12.90 in more tax revenue and fewer social costs for society, and $3.24 in higher earnings for the individual.
It isnt always a matter of state dollars. Luna has refused to even apply for $50 million in federal funding that would have simply improved the training of people already working in private early childhood learning programs.
Of course, anyone who pursues pre-K runs flat into a wall of resistance from Idaho conservatives who insist such a move would pull youngsters out of their homes.
Heres a news flash: Thats not how most Idaho children live. At least 60 percent of them dont have a stay-at-home parent. Even in a two-parent home, both are likely working.
By neglecting early childhood education, Idaho ignores an obvious need. In Idaho, 55 percent of its children live in low-income homes. If you look at this group, as many as 78 percent are not getting the boost that early childhood education could give them.
While Idahos elected leadership pursues its reform agenda, freshman state Rep. Hy Kloc, D-Boise, offers a whisper in the wilderness.
Asks Kloc: Why not set up five pilot preschool programs across Idaho? Conduct the experiment for three years. All he needs is state authorization. Foundations and private corporations would provide grants to pay for it.
Kloc says Idaho needs its own data to prove pre-Ks efficacy. Just as likely, early childhood education needs a beachhead in a heretofore politically hostile environment.
A generation ago, Idaho waited until it was a national outlier to impose even modest standards for day-care centers. Now it risks again becoming the last in the nation to do something about preschool.
Klocs plan is not revolutionary. It is simply a matter of catching up.