The ruling means cell towers, underground storage tanks, poles and towers, signposts, pipelines and conduit, and railroad track wont be eligible for the states new partial tax exemption on personal property.
Had the commission acceded to the request from companies that sought the break, all other taxpayers in the counties where their property is located would have had to pay more to make up the amount.
Realize, as we play with those pieces, we start moving who pays what, said Tax Commissioner Rich Jackson at the meeting this week.
Idaho lawmakers this year passed a $20 million partial exemption of business personal property from local property taxes, by exempting the first $100,000 of each taxpayers personal property in each Idaho county from the tax. But the Legislature didnt specify where the line fell dividing personal from real property. So the Tax Commission, working through a committee that met all summer, drafted two rules to draw that line and the railroads, pipelines and cell towers were classified as real property, ineligible for the new break.
Rick Smith, an attorney with Hawley Troxell representing Northwest Pipeline, Century Link, and AT&T, told the commission, I believe the rule is flawed. I dont think those six items of property are properly characterized as real property.
Real property includes improvements, structures and fixtures, Smith said. I just dont believe that railroad tracks is an improvement to real property. And its not a structure. That would make it a fixture, he said, but its not a fixture thats integral to the main purpose of the real estate, like an irrigation system for a farm.
Jackson countered, The railroad has a railroad system to function as a railroad. The telephone company has a series of assets to function as a telephone company. Cell towers are the same thing. So I cant quite make the distinction that you are.
Gerry White, of Union Pacific Railroad, called the proposed new rules discriminatory toward railroads.
A Micron Technology official questioned the definition of fixtures, and an Idaho Power Co. representative urged the commission to reject the new rules, prompting commissioners to note that some rule must be enacted to implement the new law.
Tax Commissioner David Langhorst, a former Democratic state senator from Boise, said, I think they made good arguments, the taxpayers today. But he said the rules take a conservative approach. And if the Legislature really did intend for this to be more liberally applied or a broader exemption created, then they can affirm that.
County assessors from across the state backed the new rules, saying they provide needed consistency.
Tax Commissioner Ken Roberts said, Whats interesting is until the $100,000 exemption took place, it really didnt matter and now all of a sudden it matters whats real and whats personal.
Roberts, a former GOP state representative from Donnelly, said the Legislature should have indicated where it wanted the line to fall between real and personal property, but it didnt.
Void of that direction somebody has to make a decision about what and where that line is, he said. Im sad to say that this decision has kind of found its way to the Tax Commission. If we get it wrong, the Legislature, who are the policy setters in the state of Idaho when it comes to tax policy, can change it.
The Legislature authorized state funds to reimburse counties for the lost revenue from the new tax break, but only at 2013 levels. If the new rules, which take effect in 2014, had exempted the additional classes of property, that wouldnt have generated any additional state reimbursement. Instead, it would have forced a tax shift, requiring all other local taxpayers in the county to pay more to make up the difference.
Betsy Z. Russell: email@example.com