West Views: Opinions from newspapers in Idaho and the West commenting on Western issues

November 18, 2013 


Post Register, Idaho Falls

The House Republican caucus is split along ideological lines. Heading the moderate faction is Speaker Scott Bedke, R-Oakley. Leading the conservative wing is Majority Leader Mike Moyle, R-Star.

There’s one thing, however, that Bedke and Moyle should agree upon: The integrity of the House is more important than politics, ideology or friendship. And so, the two top House Republicans must come together and demand an investigation into one of their own, Rep. Mark Patterson, R-Boise.

Bedke and Moyle cannot let slide facts uncovered by Ada County Sheriff Gary Raney after Patterson applied for a concealed weapon permit. Under penalty of perjury, Patterson answered no to the question, “Have you ever had an entry of a withheld judgment for a criminal offense which would disqualify you from obtaining a concealed weapon permit?”

Raney found that in 1974, Patterson received a withheld judgment after pleading guilty to assault with intent to commit rape in Florida. A 46-year-old woman said then-21-year-old Patterson coerced her into having sex by threatening to have his dog attack her. Patterson told Dan Popkey of the Idaho Statesman he couldn’t remember the incident, a product of chemotherapy treatments for hepatitis C. Hours later, however, Patterson issued a statement saying his accuser lied and that he was beaten in jail.

The story doesn’t end here, though. In 1977, Patterson was charged with another rape “by means of forcibly choking and threatening” a woman in Ohio. He was acquitted. He won’t fill in details about his past residences or occupations, though Popkey’s research shows Patterson has lived in at least five states. Finally, Patterson was accused of exaggerating his academic and professional credentials during the last election.

Ethics complaints can only be made by sitting House members. Given the ugliness of this case, a complaint shouldn’t come from just any member. It should come from the top. From Moyle, a political ally of Patterson whose involvement would signal how serious this is; from Bedke, who was elevated after his caucus grew tired of former Speaker Lawerence “Boss” Denney’s willingness to overlook the transgressions of his friends.

The House’s standing ethics committee, minus Patterson ally and defender Judy Boyle, R-Midvale, should be tasked with determining whether the Boise Republican’s regrettable past and willingness to risk perjury constitutes “conduct unbecoming a Representative which is detrimental to the integrity of the House as a legislative body.”

Bedke called Patterson’s 1974 guilty plea “certainly a serious matter.” Moyle hasn’t commented publicly. Clearly, this could go a couple of ways. Bedke and Moyle can offer Patterson the same kind of cover Denney provided tax scofflaw Phil Hart. Or they could follow the example set by the Senate, whose leadership in the past decade called for investigations into two troubled Republicans, Jack Noble of Kuna and John McGee of Caldwell.

Denney’s decision damaged his reputation and eroded public trust.

Actions by Senate leaders led to the resignations of Noble and McGee and sent a message that those elected to make the laws must abide by them as well.

Given this history, we have one question: What are Moyle and Bedke waiting for?


Lewiston Tribune

When it comes to concealed weapons permits, Idaho has two standards — one for Idaho’s 3,000 elected officials and another for the rest of us.

Rep. Lynn Luker, R-Boise, says that’s OK.

The issue came to light after Ada County Sheriff Gary Raney revoked state Rep. Mark Patterson’s concealed weapon permit. Patterson failed to disclose his withheld judgment in a 1974 Florida rape case.

But he’s been rescued by a 1909 Idaho law, which allows him to carry a concealed weapon as long as he remains in office.

Luker told the Spokesman-Review’s Betsy Russell he likes the 1909 law.

“Certainly public officials can be targets in their own rights, especially in today’s world,” Luker said.

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service