After Fort Hood, real fight began for Idaho man

(TWIN FALLS) TIMES-NEWSSeptember 22, 2013 

FT HOOD

Shawn Manning has been working to help other traumatized soldiers after his experience. “If I made it through that, there’s not much else I couldn’t make it through,” he said.

PETER HALEY — The (Tacoma, Wash.) News Tribune

LACEY, Wash. — Lying in a hospital bed hours after a man fired six bullets into his body, one might have thought Shawn Manning wouldn’t have to fight again.

The former Army staff sergeant and Army Reserve member, a Twin Falls native, had given most of his adult life to the military and had been to Iraq twice.

On Nov. 5, 2009, severely wounded, he rose and ran for the exit as Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s guns blasted, killing 13 and injuring 32 on Fort Hood, near Killeen, Texas.

Manning survived, but that was just the beginning.

Wrought with survivor’s guilt, he battled nightmares in which he again felt the bullets pushing through his flesh. He fought to save his new marriage, having promised his wife he’d be safe on his impending third deployment. He struggled to overcome physical, mental and emotional wounds.

But in the process, he came up against the very organization for which he had been fighting.

The Army decided to discharge Manning as physically unfit for duty. But what was supposed to be a six-month process took two years and prevented the mental health counselor from working elsewhere.

“In my case, I was losing almost $2,000 a month in civilian pay after I was shot,” he said.

Then he and many others were denied back pay because the Army classified the shooting as “workplace violence” rather than terrorism, despite Hasan’s extreme religious activities and communications with a known terrorist leader.

Manning lost his appeal of that classification. So he and about 160 other victims and family members sued the government.

Manning’s name is listed first on that suit.

But the fight hasn’t been without reward. Manning, 37, said he is stronger now.

‘I HAD TO STAY ALIVE FOR THAT’

As his lungs filled with blood, Manning watched Hasan shoot his friends. He had seen death before, but this was different.

Manning needed to move. He saw an injured friend he wanted to sling over his shoulder.

“In a part of my mind, I knew I would get shot in the back, and then both of us would be dead,” he recalled.

He could not let himself die because of what it would do to his mother, Shari Taylor, sister Kym Lott, new bride, Autumn, and others.

“If anything, I had to stay alive for that,” he said.

After four hours of surgery, his family rushing onto planes to reach him, he was awake and watching his attacker’s face flash across the television.

He tried to cough up the blood still in his lungs, but it wouldn’t kick out.

“My ribs were broken, so you start breathing really heavy and it’s like someone hitting you in the chest with a hammer over and over,” he said.

He said he didn’t sleep for days.

NO LONGER FIT TO SERVE

Then came the waiting game.

He’d been bedridden for weeks before they pulled out his chest tube and let him move to a hospital near home in Lacey, Wash. He could move, but it hurt, and still does.

Manning lived on pain medication, the couch and television. And the nightmares returned.

He intermittently followed the news in the shooting’s aftermath. The unit ripped apart by the shooting eventually deployed overseas, and it pained Manning to see them leave without him. He tried to stay active and not resort to self-pity. He worked to mend his relationship with his wife.

“Whether you want it to or not, it kind of comes to dominate your life,” he said. “Especially right after the fact. If that’s all you think about, that’s not very healthy for any relationship.”

Autumn is more cautious now, he said. She worries when he goes out and is very protective. But their marriage is thriving.

Manning also dedicated himself to his therapy, expecting to be back at work in six months. But in March 2010, Army officials said he was no longer fit for service. He waited for his medical evaluation board to officially discharge him. It took more than two years.

THE TERRORISM LABEL

Manning reluctantly returned to work as a civilian contractor for the Army last November.

His respect for the military had waned during the discharge process and fight for better benefits. He wasn’t sure he could stomach the system again. The Army and federal government were more interested in politics than healing the wounded, he said.

“It’s pretty simple — do the right thing, live by the values that the Army preaches to the soldiers. To see people not do that, it was a little hard to deal with,” he said.

But Manning knew what trauma-stricken, battle-fatigued soldiers endure. And he knew he could help them.

Manning wasn’t sure how he would respond to clients at first. A counselor who overly identifies with a patient can’t remain objective. Yet his experiences could be a powerful tool to get others to open up. He was nervous the first time he shared his experiences with one of his patients.

“There’s a certain amount of transference,” he said. “You can get caught up in the moment, and I could become emotional. That’s probably the biggest worry — I don’t want to tell them I went through this and seem like a mess, either.”

After Manning learned he would not receive back pay for his time out of work, he started emailing senators and members of Congress.

He appealed the decision to label Hasan’s attack as workplace violence, and his appeal board agreed.

When the decision moved to Washington, D.C., though, it was reviewed again and overturned.

A terrorism label would classify his and others’ injuries as combat-related and would get them priority placement in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The classification would also make it possible for those wounded and killed to be honored for defending their country rather than categorized as bystanders of workplace violence.

Moreover, in order for the Army to make sure such a massacre doesn’t happen again, it must admit why it happened, Manning says.

“Honestly, I have almost seen them repeat the mistake after the shooting, so it just kind of validates that,” he said.

HARD TO FORGIVE

When Hasan’s military trial began in early August, Manning was thrust into the spotlight. His testimony was chronicled in news reports nationwide, his voice and image on cable news, his thoughts inked in major newspapers.

After he testified, the court imposed a gag order on him for the rest of the proceedings.

A military jury unanimously recommended Hasan be executed after his conviction on 45 counts of premeditated murder and attempted premeditated murder.

The verdict is justified, Manning said.

“I don’t think there could have been any other sentence than death for what he did,” he said.

Officials had delayed looking into reclassifying the shooting until the trial concluded.

For now, Manning keeps his eye on legislation, works on returning to a normal life and allows time to smooth tough-to-swallow emotions.

He can’t forgive Hasan, but he can focus on healing himself and others. He can continue to fight for a positive outcome.

“I try not to let the anger eat me up,” he said.

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service