Carolyn Hax: Being the ‘best’ is not what matters

Carolyn Hax:

September 9, 2013 

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn: I live in a Washington, D.C., suburb where the school environment is highly competitive. More than 20 percent of the class gets straight A’s, and many students are accomplished in their sport, music or other extracurriculars.

My children are not quite straight-A students (mostly A’s, couple of B’s), and good at their respective extracurriculars, but not among the best, either. I dislike attending award ceremonies or other events like it where everyone else’s children are winning the awards and mine are getting “participation awards.”

My children are healthy and well-adjusted, which is more than enough to make me happy. I do feel anxious, however, that my kids won’t go on to good colleges or a good job because they are not the best.

WHERE ALL THE CHILDREN ARE ABOVE AVERAGE

Competitive child-rearing might be the most popular sport in some parts of America, particularly affluent ones.

The best outcome for your kids — best best, with no meaningful challengers — is for them to find a place in life that feels right to them based on their skills, their temperaments and their passions. That some of your kids’ A’s slip to B’s and some of their peers run/swim/flip/play/dance/sculpt/sing better is not even remotely an obstacle to this outcome. After all, those everyone-else’s-kids getting all the awards will get their butts kicked, too, probably as soon as they move on to the next level of competition.

What often does interfere with finding one’s right place in life is a preoccupation with being the best, or with getting into (the best) college, or with gaining whatever form of recognition is most valued in their peer group. This is the stuff that scrambles the very signals they need to be listening for, the signals of satisfaction with what they’re doing versus what they’re achieving. An excessive focus on winning also makes people more likely to get intimidated or discouraged and quit.

When people focus instead on what suits their interests and strengths, they’re more likely to find both a revenue stream to support themselves and a resiliency stream to carry them through bumpy times.

Please trust this, and free yourself to like them for who they are instead of worrying about who they’ll be.

You didn’t actually ask a question — does this answer it?

Re: D.C. Competitiveness: If it makes the letter-writer feel better, I think that growing up in a large, competitive environment is very good preparation for the real world. My significant other grew up in a small town where he was constantly recognized for achievement as the big fish in a little pond. I grew up in a large urban area where I did well — along with many, many of my peers. My experience seems to mirror more closely our adult lives, where it’s most important to be comfortable with what you have and what you are doing rather than deriving happiness and self-worth from external recognition and standards.

ANONYMOUS

Memo to small-town parents: YOU ARE NOT FREAKING OUT ENOUGH ABOUT YOUR KIDS’ VIABILITY IN A COMPETITIVE WORLD.

Kidding. (See above.)

I think the reasoning that people do better as adults when they’re allowed to stumble toward their own bliss as kids is universally and pan-geographically applicable.

Fair?

Email tellme@washpost.com. Chat online at 10 a.m. Fridays at www.washingtonpost.com.

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service