Rocky Barker: Heyburn, Roosevelt had land debate

Idaho StatesmanAugust 12, 2013 

I looked backed at the writings between Idaho’s Republican Sen. Weldon Heyburn and President Theodore Roosevelt in 1905 about Idaho’s forest reserves to prepare for covering the Idaho Legislature’s Interim Committee on Federal Lands on Friday.

These two Republicans had clear differences about the value of the reserves and their role in American life. Heyburn saw the reserves as an affront to the state’s ability to choose the remaining 50,000 acres the federal government promised it would get under the Admissions Act.

At statehood in 1890, Idaho received federal grants of 3.65 million acres, but it took a few years to identify all the lands it wanted. Today the state has 2.46 million acres.

“I am not opposed to creating forest reserves for proper purposes, but I insist that they should be created upon the ground and not upon the maps; that is, from information obtained on the ground, and not by drawing lines upon the map,” Heyburn wrote Roosevelt in 1904. “I also submit that they should be created only after full and thorough consultation with those representing the state.”

He also saw it as limiting the settlement and growth of the state at a time when homesteaders could get 160 acres by simply clearing it. Roosevelt did not view the people who were claiming the forest lands and selling them to speculators the same as those making claims in agricultural areas.

“He is not the man who tills the soil, builds the home, and brings permanent prosperity to the region,” Roosevelt said in his letter of June 13, 1905. “This is the man who skins the country and moves on.”

Idaho’s other U.S. senator at the time, Fred T. DuBois, expressed the views of Southern Idaho farm communities that liked the reserves because they protected the flows in the rivers. Issues over mining and grazing had already been resolved, and ranchers realized that the reserves prevented their grazing lands from being taken over by homesteaders.

“Forest reserves and irrigation go hand in hand; you can not separate one from the other,” DuBois said. “The trouble with my colleague, Senator Heyburn, is, I think, that he is making a fight based upon conditions which do not now exist.”

The biggest problem Heyburn and Idaho Gov. Frank Gooding had with Roosevelt and his executive decision establishing the forest reserves, now the state’s national forests, was that they felt the outcome of TR’s land review was pre-ordained.

In 1907, Heyburn tried to block Roosevelt from creating new reserves with an amendment on a spending bill that required congressional approval. Before Roosevelt signed the bill, he created 16 million acres of new reserves, including many in Idaho.

Boise State University political science professor John Freemuth said that’s how he felt when he served on the Idaho Federal Lands Task Force in the late 1990s. He quit when the panel refused to include the national interest in these lands in their proposals.

That’s why he hopes the current interim committee includes a look at the collaborations going on around the state.

“Collaboration is not pre-ordained,” Freemuth said.

Rocky Barker: 377-6484

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service