The tough, twisted trail to child pornographers

In 2009, only about 5,000 people were arrested in the U.S. for possessing or distributing materials.

THE DALLAS MORNING NEWSJuly 28, 2013 

Map of the world showing global trail of child pornographer Tim Whitington, whose trail started in Australia, jumped to England, then to Texas and beyond.

DALLAS MORNING NEWS

DALLAS — When federal agents and Euless, Texas, police officers showed up at his door, Tim Whitington didn’t even ask why they were there.

“You’re here for the bad stuff,” he said.

And just like that — after agents escorted a young boy away — Whitington directed them to a wooden box containing a flash drive.

What they found was disturbing: graphic pornographic images of children. Even more troubling was the discovery of a relatively new form of child pornography, one in which perpetrators request a specific type of molestation they watch online as it happens.

The photographic evidence, and Whitington’s arrest, led to the apprehension of a half-dozen child molesters across the country.

The Whitington case was a victory in the fight against child pornography, law enforcement officials say. It’s a war worth waging, but one they don’t expect to win.

In a typical week, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children in Virginia fields about 10,000 child pornography-related tips, said Michelle Collins, vice president of the center’s exploited children division. About 91 million child porn images and videos have been seized by authorities since 2002.

While the number of child pornography arrests is small, last week, 255 people were arrested as part of a national roundup of child predators.

It’s no secret what’s behind the rapid increase in the creation and distribution of child pornography, experts say. The Internet has made child pornography easy to make, find and trade.

Law enforcement groups target the problem, but their numbers are small and the caseload heavy. The topic will be explored next month when experts from around the world come to Dallas for the annual Crimes Against Children Conference, which will be hosted by the Dallas Police Department and the Dallas Children’s Advocacy Center.

The public, for the most part, doesn’t want to face the problem, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Lewis, who prosecuted Whitington.

“Who wants to think of something as grotesque and awful as children being raped for someone’s pleasure?” Lewis asked. “No one wants to believe that it actually lies in the heart of a man.”

Law enforcement authorities say the public needs to be aware of the rarely discussed crime.

Whitington, who declined an interview from prison, was an outwardly unremarkable 44-year-old businessman when he was arrested at his Euless apartment in 2010.

But Pat McGaha, a Homeland Security Investigations agent, called him a “monster” and the people he traded images with “vipers.”

Homeland Security Investigations is a division of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The department is one of the main agencies that investigates child pornography because so much of the material crosses state and national borders.

Whitington’s case, which is still leading to prosecutions almost three years later, offers a rare glimpse into the battle against child porn production.

NOT ‘DIRTY PICTURES’

Whitington’s world began unraveling in November 2010 in Australia. A known sex offender was arrested for possession of “first generation” child pornography — images police had never seen before.

Many pictures seized by authorities have circulated for decades. Some are known by name, such as the “Misty” or “Vicky” series, and are highly prized by child pornography “collectors.” For them, it’s like collecting baseball cards.

“First generation” material alarms officials because it means there’s a new victim.

Make no mistake, said Dan Powers, clinical director of the Children’s Advocacy Center of Collin County, child pornography is abuse. The majority of actively traded images show some sort of physical sexual abuse of prepubescent children, according to Collins.

“This is not ‘dirty pictures,’” Powers said. “This is victimization of children.”

Powers and other experts avoid the term “child pornography” because it minimizes the crime. Children, unlike adults, cannot consent.

“It is not porn,” said Matthew Dunn, a cybercrime supervisor in the Irving office of Homeland Security Investigations. “It is child abuse material, plain and simple.”

The pictures viewed in Australia were made in England by a man who raped a boy and a girl under the age of 13. After his arrest, officials tipped their American counterparts that the Englishman also had been chatting online with a man known as “Txfordguy.”

The information reached the Irving office of Homeland Security on Dec. 23, 2010.

Like everyone else, agent Brad Hudson was ready to shift into holiday mode.

When he read the online chats with “Txfordguy,” he knew agents needed to act.

“Txfordguy,” also known as “Timdubbya,” had told the English molester, “I want you to do x-y-z to your kids and send me those pictures so I can show it to (my victim),” Hudson said.

“What we had was him directing somebody to produce child porn and send it to him,” the agent said. And the chats indicated “Txfordguy” planned to rape a boy he knew.

‘THEY DON’T LOOK LIKE MONSTERS’

The Internet is a double-edged sword: It makes sexual abuse images incredibly easy to access but it also leaves electronic footprints.

Homeland Security quickly traced the account used by “Txfordguy” to Whitington’s apartment. A background check showed he was a divorced father without a criminal record.

“He was just your average Joe, coming to work and going home,” Hudson said.

“They don’t have horns; they don’t look like monsters,” McGaha said. “They’re real congenial guys — that’s why they’re so good at it.”

Most offenders know their victims and often coerce them with treats and rewards instead of threats, Powers said.

And most producers of child porn are motivated by sexual arousal, not profit.

When laws targeting child pornography first went into effect in the 1970s, commercial producers were more common. They sold images by mail but were mostly shut down in the 1980s.

Commercial sites surfaced again in the early days of the Internet, maintaining websites for paid subscribers. But again, they were put out of business fairly quickly.

Unfortunately, demand remained high.

The Internet, experts agree, brought child pornography out of the back alley and into the private home.

For people who would never “buy an adult porn magazine, much less something about children, it’s a mouse click away now,” said Plano police Detective Jeff Rich.

Authorities knew from chat logs that Whitington talked about abusing a young boy. So when neighbors mentioned they’d seen a child coming and going from the apartment, the sense of urgency grew.

Homeland Security contacted local police. Before they served the search warrant on Dec. 27, police parked a marked car outside Whitington’s apartment to let residents know law enforcement was on the scene.

Then Hudson and McGaha, casually dressed with guns concealed, approached the building while the search team of a half-dozen armored agents remained behind.

Whitington didn’t resist and could have left while agents searched his apartment. Instead, he sat down to talk.

Within five minutes, he had confessed, McGaha said. Whitington gave agents his encryption key, enabling them to find the illegal material quickly.

Even with cooperation, child pornography cases take massive amounts of time and money to investigate, said Rich, the Plano detective.

The house where a raid is conducted may have several residents and multiple computers. Officers must determine who accessed the devices for pornographic purposes, and each computer image must be examined.

The images, which often number in the hundreds of thousands, can take weeks to sift through.

“It’s not like it used to be where everybody’s got a 30-gig hard drive,” McGaha said. “Now we have terabytes.”

‘KNEW IT WAS WRONG’

Whitington’s collection wasn’t huge, but authorities say he didn’t need images to experience sexual satisfaction: He told them he’d been sexually touching the boy whom agents escorted away for several years.

Like many molesters, Whitington — a self-described nudist — rationalized his actions, telling agents that if the boy had said no, he would have stopped. Like most victims, the child never told anyone about the abuse.

Whitington held his head in his hands while he talked, agents said, but “he just didn’t think he had done anything really wrong,” McGaha said.

“We were telling him, ‘You can’t do that. It’s illegal,’ and he said, ‘Well, what’s a nudist to do?’ ”

Whitington pleaded guilty to the federal child pornography charges for ordering molestations online, but not guilty to a state charge of continuous sexual abuse of a child.

Whitington “knew it was wrong,” said Tarrant County Assistant District Attorney Eric Nickols, who prosecuted the state case. “He just wanted it to be OK.”

Jurors were shown the pornography but “the chat logs were actually harder to hear about,” Nickols said. “It was kind of like a pedophile’s playbook.”

One of Whitington’s state defense attorneys, Stephanie Patten, said the chat logs and pictures were used to convict him, but Whitington was not charged with pornography in state court.

Whitington, who was sentenced to 16 years in federal court and 50 years in state prison, plans to appeal the state sentence.

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service