Secret no-fly list blamed for American's Bangkok nightmare

Travelers sometimes are marooned abroad without being told why or when they can go home.

TRIBUNE WASHINGTON BUREAUJune 29, 2013 

For two weeks, Rehan Motiwala, a 29-year-old medical student from Pomona, Calif., sat stranded at the Bangkok airport, sleeping for 10 nights on a roach-infested mattress in a dank, windowless detention room reserved for deportees.

Motiwala, a U.S. citizen, wanted to return to his family in Southern California. But earlier this month, en route from Jakarta, Indonesia, to LAX, airline staff in Bangkok refused to issue him a boarding pass for his connecting flight. U.S. and Thai officials told him that he could not travel but offered no explanation, leading him to believe he had been placed on the U.S. government's secret no-fly list.

After dozing on benches and wandering the airport terminal for four nights, Motiwala was told that a Justice Department official had arrived from the United States to question him. When he declined to answer questions without a lawyer present, U.S. officials left him in the custody of Thai authorities, who tossed him into a detention center in the bowels of Suvarnabhumi Airport.

"They treat you like an animal," Motiwala said in a phone interview.

Motiwala's travel nightmare ended Friday morning when he was finally granted permission to fly out of Bangkok. But his ordeal underscores the mystery that continues to surround the no-fly list 12 years after its creation. U.S. officials refuse to say who is on the list or why, arguing that any explanation could alert potential terrorists about who is being watched.

UNRESOLVED ISSUES

In 2010, after the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the no-fly list, the government said that it had created a procedure to bring American citizens and permanent residents stuck overseas back to the United States regardless of their no-fly status. The goal was to "quickly resolve the travel issues of U.S. persons located abroad," a senior FBI official told a federal court at the time.

Cases like Motiwala's show how the government has failed to carry out that policy, civil rights groups say.

"The onus is really on the government to facilitate the return of this person," said Fatima Dadabhoy, an attorney with the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Los Angeles, which is representing Motiwala. "Whether or not they're on the no-fly list, they can still come home."

OTHER CASES

The group says it is handling at least two other cases of U.S. persons from the L.A. area who have been barred from flying and are marooned abroad.

While travelers can petition to be removed from the no-fly list, civil liberties advocates say the Department of Homeland Security's redress process is so opaque that the only way to know if you've been cleared is to try to fly again.

A federal appeals court in Oregon last week heard arguments in a case brought by the ACLU, whose clients are suing the government to be removed from the list or told why they are on it.

State and Justice Department officials in Washington offered no information about Motiwala's status, saying they couldn't discuss specific cases. The American Embassy in Bangkok, whose consular officers were in contact with Motiwala during his detention, declined to comment.

A Justice Department official said that about 20,000 people were on the no-fly list as of October, including between 500 and 1,000 American citizens. Experts say that cases of travelers being stuck in an airport are extremely rare.

Motiwala, whose parents are of Pakistani origin, was not told why he might be on the list. A likely possibility, however, is his contact with Tablighi Jamaat, a conservative Muslim missionary movement based in South Asia.

He took leave from medical school last year, traveled to Pakistan to visit relatives and went on to Indonesia to work with the group, whose members go around the world proselytizing for Islam.

Tablighi Jamaat is widely regarded as peaceful and apolitical, claiming millions of followers, but U.S. and European law enforcement officials in the past have raised questions about its connections to radical Islam.

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service