As the U.S. Senate moves toward a vote on allowing states to collect sales tax on Internet sales to their residents, Idahos two senators have lined up strongly behind the concept though not necessarily the details.
GOP Sens. Jim Risch and Mike Crapo voted with the majority in the Senates 74-20 decision to take up the bill, S. 743, but both voted against a later motion to end debate and proceed. That passed anyway, on a 63-30 vote. The Idaho senators say their concern was that the Senates Democratic leadership didnt plan to allow for amendments, and there are several they believe the bill needs.
We just cant support it in the form that its in, Risch says.
In particular, Risch says hed like to see the small-business exemption in the bill rise from the current $1 million in annual receipts to around $3 million. He also wants to clarify language that some fear could authorize states to tax financial transactions like the sale of a share of stock. Those two things were deal-breakers for us, he says.
Crapo says: It is not, as some have believed, a tax on Internet sales, which I would strongly oppose, but is instead, as I see it, a states rights bill. It allows states to develop their own policy with regard to sales tax on Internet sales, and has the federal government stay out of the way.
Idaho law already deals with the issue, and has since long before there was an Internet. Since Idahos 1965 sales tax law, Idahoans who buy items from remote sellers like catalog or Internet retailers and dont pay the states sales tax are supposed to report those purchases and pay the tax each year on their state income tax returns. However, few do.
Last year, in tax year 2011, 9,555 Idaho tax returns reported use tax on such purchases, averaging $56 per return. But there were about 700,000 returns in all, putting compliance at a measly 1.4 percent. And thats up from previous years. In tax year 2010, 8,900 returns reported use tax averaging $53, and in tax year 2009, there were 8,200 averaging $48.
We do have people complying, but it is a relatively low number at this point, says Doreen Warren, administrator for the Revenue Operations Division of the Idaho State Tax Commission.
Thats the case in most states. Its difficult to get taxpayers to self-report and pay the tax on their online purchases. Thats why a consortium of states has been working for years to come up with a mechanism to allow companies to easily calculate and remit the tax to the states where their customers made their purchases. S. 743 would authorize any state thats a member of that Streamlined Sales and Use Tax project to require companies to collect and remit the tax.
The Idaho Legislature has been debating the issue for years, pushed in part by Idaho retailers who complain that customers come in and browse their goods, then make their purchases online to avoid the state sales tax sending those dollars out of state.
This year, the House Revenue & Taxation Committee voted 10-5 against introducing a bill designed to set the state up to collect the tax if Congress gives the OK, becoming a part of the multistate consortium.
Rep. Lance Clow, R-Twin Falls, the bills sponsor, says the latest estimates are that Idaho citizens are spending $1.08 billion on Internet purchases a year all of which is supposed to be subject to the states 6 percent tax. That would mean the state is missing out on nearly $65 million a year in taxes that legally are due and payable. Plus, he says e-commerce is growing at two to three times the rate of traditional retail sales, so the tax gap will continue to grow.
Clows bill was backed by the Idaho Association of Counties, the Association of Idaho Cities, the Idaho Association of Commerce & Industry, the Idaho Chamber Alliance and the Idaho Retailers Association.
Risch says hes confident the federal bill will pass the Democratic-controlled Senate, but prospects are less certain in the House. This is bipartisan, he says.
The bills lead sponsor is Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming. Its title is the Marketplace Fairness Act.