President renews effortto close prison in Cuba

With 100 Guantanamo prisoners staging a hunger strike, Obama looks for a solution.

NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICEMay 1, 2013 

APTOPIX Obama

President Barack Obama on Tuesday renewed his pledge to close the prison for terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

CHARLES DHARAPAK — The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama said on Tuesday that he would recommit himself to closing the Guantanamo Bay prison, a goal that he all but abandoned in the face of congressional opposition in his first term.

"It's not sustainable," Obama said at a White House news conference. "The notion that we're going to keep 100 individuals in no man's land in perpetuity," he added, makes no sense. "All of us should reflect on why exactly are we doing this? Why are we doing this?"

Describing the prison as a waste of taxpayer money that has had a damaging effect on U.S. foreign policy, Obama said he would try again to persuade Congress to lift restrictions on transferring inmates. He also said he had ordered a review of "everything that we can do administratively."

But there is no indication that Obama's proposal to close the prison in Cuba, as he vowed to do upon taking office in 2009 after criticizing it during the presidential campaign, has become any more popular. Obama remarked that "it's a hard case to make" because "it's easy to demagogue the issue."

The plan for Guantanamo he proposed - moving any remaining prisoners to a supermax-style prison in Illinois - was blocked by Congress, which barred any further transfers of detainees onto domestic soil.

A spokesman for Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican Senate leader and one of the leading opponents of closing the prison, said on Tuesday that "there is wide, bipartisan opposition in Congress to the president's goal of moving those terrorists to American cities and towns."

Obama made his remarks after the arrival at the prison of more than three dozen Navy nurses, corpsmen and specialists to help deal with a mass hunger strike by inmates, many of whom have been held for more than 11 years without trial.

As of Tuesday, 21 prisoners were being force-fed a nutritional supplement through tubes inserted in their noses.

"I don't want these individuals to die," Obama said.

Both conservatives and civil libertarians said that under existing law Obama could do more to reduce the number of low-level detainees held at the prison.

The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Howard McKeon, R-Calif., noted that the Obama administration had never exercised the power it has had since in 2012 to waive, on a case-by-case basis, most of the restrictions lawmakers have imposed on transferring detainees to countries with troubled security conditions.

Human-rights groups also said Obama should appoint a White House official to run Guantanamo policy with the authority to resolve interagency disputes.

For example, because of disagreements over evidence tainted by torture, the administration has missed by more than a year a deadline to begin parole-style hearings by so-called Periodic Review Boards.

"There's more to be done, but these are the two essential first steps the president can take now to break the Guantanamo logjam," said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Obama's policy has been to continue to imprison high-risk detainees indefinitely under the laws of war - just somewhere else. At one point Tuesday, Obama appeared to question that policy.

"The idea that we would still maintain forever a group of individuals who have not been tried," he said, "that is contrary to who we are, contrary to our interests, and it needs to stop."

Idaho Statesman is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service