Adapted from a recent online discussion.
Carolyn: Should the live-in significant other of one of our siblings be included in a family wedding photo? The cohabiting pair don’t have an opinion nor do the bride or groom, but the matriarch feels strongly that the S.O. be a part of it, and another person strongly opposes that. What do you think?
WHOM TO INCLUDE?
One shot with, one without.
Re: Family Photo: When nobody involved particularly cares, I advocate going for inclusion and defining “family” as “people who matter in our hearts and minds” rather than “people who share a blood relationship and/or signed a piece of paper.”
ANONYMOUS
I agree. And when people do care, take different versions. Someone else suggested a bunch of different configurations, and that’s even better — as long as it doesn’t take all day.
Carolyn: In a past column (http://wapo.st/SH2fE0), you re-enforced a writer’s objection to a pink, strapless bridesmaid dress by suggesting she ask for alterations or another role in her brother’s wedding.
I’m not inclined to support a gaggle of bridesmaids and don’t like the matchy-matchy outfit that rarely flatters all, but it’s just a dress. She could throw a shawl over it as soon as the ceremony is over.
The important thing is that the woman marrying her brother is trying to include her. The writer said she’s not close to the brother. By participating in his wedding and getting to know his bride, she can build a closer relationship. The bride is offering her a gift, and I was surprised you endorsed her issues with the dress over encouraging her not to look a pink strapless dress in the mouth.
ANONYMOUS
The important thing is her inclusion, yes, but I don’t agree that the dress is a nonnegotiable element of the most important thing. Anyone who feels uncomfortable in a bridesmaid’s dress — not just “ew, pink washes me out,” but moved-to-withdraw-from-the-wedding-party uncomfortable, as this woman was — should feel free to say that to the bride.
Email tellme@washpost.com. Chat online at 10 a.m. Fridays at www.washingtonpost.com
