The campaign to expand Idahos Human Rights Act centered on a straightforward slogan: Add The Words.
So now, what words can we add to our description of the 2012 Legislature?
How about callous?
Or dismissive?
Or embarrassing?
All of these words fairly describe the actions of the Senate State Affairs Committee Friday.
On a party-line decision, and without much second thought, the committee rejected a proposal to extend human rights protections to gays, lesbians and transgender Idahoans. This basic, fair step to prevent discrimination in the workplace and the housing market didnt get a hearing.
In the committees narrow view, this proposal didnt even merit real consideration. Fridays hearing was a print hearing when a committee decides whether to introduce a bill. A printed bill becomes a piece of the sessions public record a document all Idahoans can read and judge for themselves.
Legislative committees sometimes print bills to advance the discussion of an important issue. On Friday, discrimination didnt make the cut. The State Affairs Committee had neither the time nor the empathy. Committee members couldnt dismiss this idea or its proponents quickly enough.
Oh, sure, committee Chairman Curt McKenzie, R-Nampa, moved Fridays meeting to the Statehouses largest meeting room. The better to let supporters have a seat before they were summarily shown the door. The committee didnt even take public testimony, which McKenzie could easily have allowed.
When it came down to a voice vote, only Democrats Edgar Malepeai of Pocatello and Michelle Stennett of Ketchum voted to print the proposal. McKenzie sat silently (he later said he would have voted to print the bill, had a roll call been requested). But McKenzie didnt do nearly enough to persuade the other Republicans on his committee: Russ Fulcher of Meridian, Chuck Winder of Boise, Patti Anne Lodge of Huston, John McGee of Caldwell, Bart Davis of Idaho Falls and Brent Hill of Rexburg.
The Republicans treatment of this issue was worse than shabby. Consider what McGee told reporters after the meeting: For me to tell you that (discrimination) doesnt exist would be naive.
As difficult as it might be, lets momentarily forget McGees own baggage. Instead, lets concentrate on what he said as spokesman for the Senate GOP caucus. Discrimination happens. But it isnt enough of a problem to justify legislation. The solution, he weakly offered, is continued education.
Sure. And heres the lesson from the Senate State Affairs Committee: Employers and landlords, youre on the honor system. As long as discrimination doesnt get any worse, were not going to get involved.
The fact that this lesson came from the state Senates most powerful committee including Hill, Davis, Winder and McGee, the four members of the GOPs leadership team is all the more disappointing.
These legislators, perhaps more than most, should be able to see that Fridays vote puts Idaho on the wrong side of history, on the wrong side of a generational change.
The evidence should be all around them.
In Olympia, Wash., a bill on the way to Gov. Chris Gregoire would make Washington the nations seventh state that recognizes gay marriage.
A San Francisco federal appeals court the court that happens to have jurisdiction over Idaho rejected Californias voter-passed initiative banning gay marriage.
But that wasnt even the issue before Senate State Affairs Committee members Friday. Not even close. A 2006 state constitutional amendment bans gay marriage, rendering that issue moot.
The only issue before lawmakers Friday was a simple one: Should Idaho protect Idahoans from being the subject of discrimination based on their sexual orientation or their gender identity? By refusing to consider the issue, these lawmakers perpetuated prejudice.
Which means that another word can be attached to their actions.
Shameful.
Our View is the editorial position of the Idaho Statesman. It is an unsigned opinion expressing the consensus of the Statesmans editorial board. To comment on an editorial or suggest a topic, email editorial@idahostatesman.com.











